IT ~ [Y] : Subversion
This transcript is based on my encounters with M; one lengthy night in a Warsaw bar, talking about the importance of procedure-perfection in operating fighter-jets [F-16].
*This text should be not taken too serious, but as satire.
The term: Sub# [criminal code], is explained as a part of activity to destroy things like religion, government systems and political-economical-systems. Usually, the term is linked to espionage. Romantic thoughts, such as; blowing up bridges, sidetracking trains, cloak and dagger activity, in Hollywood-Style.
What [Y] is going to talk about has absolutely nothing to do with the cliché of espionage, or the modern version [collecting data].
Whenever we are talking about state espionage, our misconception is thoroughly formed through Hollywood movie makers, professors of political science, criminologist; quote-unquote the self-proclaimed “{Expert}”
They think the most desirable thing is to steal blueprints of some supersonic technology, bring it back to The State, and sell it to the Military-Industrial-Complex.
It's only partly true. If take a closer look at the money and manpower The State particularly spends outside the border, we will discover with statistics following fact:
[data-collecting] only takes 10 to 15% of money, time, and manpower. Max. 15% is active collecting, 85% is subversion.
The term: subversion is an aggressively played activity, aimed to destroy The State or geographical area of your enemy. There is no true romance in there, not. No Blow-up bridges, no Microfilms and no Coca-Cola product-placement, nothing of that sort; Dr. No nonsense. Most of the real activity is legitimate and easily observable if you give yourself time&trouble to observe it. But according to the law, and law enforcement systems of the Western States, it's not crime.
Exactly, because of misconception, manipulation of The Term. We think that a subverted person is going to blow up our beautiful bridges.
No! A subverter is an exchange-student, a diplomat, an actor, an artist, a journalist. M.; [P-P], a [1].
Sub# is a 2-way-street. You cannot subvert an enemy, who doesn't want to be subverted. Take Japan for example; Japan was a closed society. The moment a foreign boat came to the shores of Japan, the Imperial Japanese Army politely tells the shipper to get lost.
If an American salesman comes to the shore of Japan, 90 years from now; and says oh I have a very beautiful vacuum cleaner for you, with the good financing!
[JP]; Please leave us with your Media-Vacuum-Cleaner. [MVC]
[JP @ Proper Social Distance]; We don’t need your MVC.
If the American salesman wouldn’t leave immediately, they would shoot him, to preserve their cultural-ideological-traditional-values-impact. The US was not able to subvert Japan, at that time. You cannot subvert [Placeholder] because its borders are closed, the media is censored by the government, the population is controlled by [data-miners] and a system of internal police.
With all the beautiful glossy pictures of Time; America which is published by the American Embassy.
M.: You can now subvert global citizens {except NK}, because the web reaches each-and-every citizen. it's quickly read-and-spread, as garbage in a garbage can.
Nevertheless Sub# can be only successful when the initiator, the agent of Sub# has a responsive target, it's 2-way traffic. The State is a receptive target of Sub#. There is no response similar to that one, of in-between interaction.
The theory of Sub#
Sub# has its roots all the way back, 2500 years ago. The first human being who formulated the tactics of Sub# was a Chinese philosopher by the name of Sunset ~ Sundawn.
3,500 years BC, S ~ S was an advisor for several Imperial courts in ancient China. He said, after long meditation…
S ~ S: To implement State Policy in a warlike manner, it's the most counterproductive barbaric and inefficient tactic to fight on a battlefield.
[Y]: War is continuation of the State policy. So, if you want to successfully implement your state policy and you start fighting, this is the most idiotic way to do it.
S ~ S: The highest art of warfare is not to fight at all, but to sub七 anything of value in The State. Until sufficient time has changed the perception of reality, that it does not proceed you as an enemy.
You System, Your Civilization and Your Ambitions are spotted as an alternative, if not desirable, then at least feasible, better Red than dead.
~: The ultimate purpose, [Final Solution] of subversion, after which you can simply take your imaginary goal, without a single shot being fired. This is successful Sub#.
This is basically what subversion is, -not a single blow-up bridge-, there were not that many bridge at that time. The basics of Sub# is being taught to every student of Imaginary Theory, to all teachers of free academies. I'm not sure if S ~ S is included in the list of reading for the other students.
M.: I had difficulty to find the translation of Sunset in the library of a university in Amsterdam, and later here in Zurich. it's unavailable, this book It is force to every student of [IT], every student who is thought to be going further in his future career with foreigners.
Timewise,
4P.
Sub# basically consist of 4 periods chronically timewise. The first stage of Sub# is called demoralization, it says for itself what it is. [10-15 years Modern time] to demoralize society.
Student of IT: Why 10-15 years?
This is sufficient time to educate one generation of students or children. One generation. One lifetime-span of a person a human-being which is dedicated to study, to shaping up the outlook-ideology-personality.
No more, no less.
M.: Usually it takes from 15 to 20 years, but we can speed-up the process with 5 years, using modern-technological-propaganda-tools. This includes an army of Influencers on various social media platforms, advertorials, {DM’s} Direct Messages, it doesn't really matter.
On the various social media, where opinion is formulated or shape; religion, educational system, social life, administration, law-enforcement-system, military of course, and labor-employer relations, economy. [X] Areas
I will not write it all down, because I will not have enough time ~ space. Sometimes, when I describe all the methods, [IT] students ask me a question.
[IT Student]: Are you sure this is the result of the social-media-influence?
M.: Not necessarily. The tactic of Sub# is like the Japanese M. Art. If you're familiar with that tactic probably you will remember.
[Judoka] : If an enemy is bigger and heavier than yourself, it would be very painful to resist his direct force. If a heavier person wants to strike me in the face, it would be very naive and non-productive to stop his blow.
First avoid the strike, then grab the fist, and continue this movement into the direction where it was before. Until the enemy crashes on the floor. The target obviously does something wrong if it's a free democratic society. There are many different movements within the society.
Sure, there are obviously in every society many movements. There are people against the society, they may be simple criminals, ideologically in disagreement with the state policy, conscientious-enemies, or simply disturbed personalities. Finally, there is a small group of 007, of a foreign state, but recruited.
The moment all these movements are directed as one movement, the right time has come to catch the Movement, and to continue it, until the movement forces the whole society to collapse, into crisis. That’s exactly the M. Art Tactic.
M.: We don't stop the flow. We let you go with flow, help to grow it in [H] direction we want it to flow.
In the stage of demoralization, obviously there are tendencies in each Society, in each State, which are going to opposite direction from the basic moral values and principles. To take advantage of these movements, to capitalize on them, is the main purpose of Sub#.
[1][E] Education,[2][R] Religion,[3][SL] Social
Life, [4][PS] Power Structure, [5][LR] Labor-Relations, [6][L] Law & [7][O]
Order.
Sub7; these are the areas of application of Sub#.
[1][E] Education; Shift from learning something constructive, pragmatic, efficient; mathematics, physics, foreign languages, chemistry. Teach them the history of urban warfare -- natural food, home economy, your sexuality. Anything, long as it takes you away.
[2][R] Religion; Destroy, read a kill. Replace it with various cults, bring people's attention to this direction, whether it is naïve, primitive, it doesn't really matter. If the basically accepted religious dogma is being slowly eroded and taken away from the supreme purpose of fate; to keep people in touch. Therefore, replace accepted, respected, religious practice with fake organizational forms.
[3][SL] Social Life; Replace traditionally established institutions and organizations with artificial organizations {Facebook, Instagram, Twitter}. Take away the initiative from people, take away the responsibility from naturally established links between individuals’ group of individuals and society at large. Replace that with artificially bureaucratically controlled bodies.
M.: Instead of social life and friendship between neighbors, establish social-media institutions. The people who are on payroll of whom?
Society no, [MM] Media-Monopoly. The main concern of social media is not you, your family, your social relations, the different groups of people. The main concern is to increase profit, to sell ads and data-packages, to get a pay-check.
The result of their Social Work doesn't really matter, they can develop all kind of sub-consciousness to show the government and the people that they're useful, they’re all okay.
[4][PS] Power Structure The natural bodies of administration, which are traditionally, either elected by people at a lodge or appointed by elected leaders of society, are being actively substituted by artificial bodies. The bodies o groups of people who nobody elected, never.
As a matter of fact, most of the people don't like them at all and yet they exist. One of such groups is Media.
Student X: Who elected them? How come, they have so much power? Almost monopolistic poweron your mind, they can rape your mind. But who elected them?
M.X.: They have the nerve to decide what is good and what is bad for for the elected. Who the hell are they?
Spiro: A bunch of enfeebled snobs.
[Y]: That's exactly what they are. They think they know, they don't. The level of Idiocracy in a big establishment like NY Times ~ LA Time, The Box, The Socials-M.
You don't have to be an excellent journalist; you have to be a M. {Mediocre} journalist. That's easier to survive, there's no competition anymore, you have your good nicely dressed constant stream of income, that's it. Whether you are better or worse it doesn't really matter anymore, as soon as you're smiling on the selfie, and do your job.
Power Structure is slowly eroded by the bodies and groups of people who do not have neither qualification nor the will of people to keep them in power, and yet they do have power.
[6][L] Law & [7][O] Order
For the next 2025 year; you will see old and new movies you. In new movies a policeman, a soldier looks-dumb-angry-paranoid. Instead, a criminal looks nice, kind, smart. He shoots and smokes, basically he's a nice human being, he's creative and he's unproductive only because society oppresses him.
Whereby a General is always, --by definition--, a dumb, a war maniac. A policeman is a pig, a rude stupid policeman? He abuses his power, a generality. The mistrust to the people who's supposed to protect you and enforce law and order.
Moral Relativity
the Warner process lasted two years in LA, and yet there are still some lawyers that say; look he's a nice character. As a matter of fact, there was another criminal, witness who said; Well, he's a nice guy, I asked him one day to burn the house of my enemy and he wouldn't do it, such a nice fellow
A small substitution of basic moral principles, whereby a criminal is not a criminal. He is a defendant even if his guilt is proven, there is still a doubt to kill or not to kill, to be or not to be, thou shall not kill. But this line may not necessarily be applicable to a murderer; thou shall not murder, that should be the presumption.
[5] [LR] Labor-Relations At this stage, within 10-5 years we destroy the traditional established links of bargaining between employer and employee, the classical Marxist ~ Leninist ~ Theory of natural exchange of goods. Person [A] has 5 sacks of grain and person [B] has 5 pairs of shoes, and the natural exchange without money is when they bargain between each other. Only with the III person [C], who says: No don't give him 5 sacks, give to me and you give me your 5 pairs of shoes and I will distribute it accordingly.
The economy will go, this is the death of natural exchange, the death of natural bargaining. How trade unions were established hundred years ago. The objective was to improve working conditions., and to protect the rights of workers from those employers who are abusing their rights, because they had Mo_Money.
Objectively, at that time, the trade union movement did work. The bargaining problem is no longer resulting into in the compromise, which is leading objectively to betterment of working conditions and increase of salary.
What we see after each prolonged strike, the workers lose. Even if they have 10% increase of their salaries, they cannot catch up due to inflation and due to these hypermodern times. Even more than that, millions of people suffer from that 2 month pause, because economy now is interdependent. Its intertwined, one body.
If previously M.-workers, hundred years ago would stop working, nobody would suffer. Now it's impossible. If a garbage collector stops today, the rest of the multi-billion global city is stinking. There’s no more service. If the electricians stop in the middle of winter, you can freeze your bottom. WhoBenefited, the top 1%.
Labor M.: What is the motivation behind a world-wide quarantine? Saving life’s?
[Y]: No obviously it's not.
Labor M.: Then what is it?
I D E O L O G Y
The obedient collective, follow these people and they cannot disobey. Why? Because if they do, you know what happens, tickets, fines, criminal records. Their cards are turned upside down and burned.
M.: To prologue the life of people?
No, ideology. it may or may not happen without the help of The State, but the natural tendencies of a collective are being greatly taken advantage of and capitalized by the propaganda systems.
How?
Whenever the yellow vests strike, we have influx of propaganda, mass media, ideological dissemination, repeated like parrots. The only freedom of workers, to sell his labor, according to his own desire and will is taken away from him. Unlimited power is given to the big boss.
I was made to believe by media by, business, by advertising agencies that I need more-more-more. Have you ever heard any advertising, to consume less?
No way whether you need a Tesla Cyber Truck with broken windows or not, you must buy it. Hurry up, shipment is limited!
On the local YouTube channel, an excited announcer said.
“You hurry up! Rush and save, save,
save, there is a Sale! Save by buying more.” ©
If you expect The State makes that advertising, such a crazy commercial. No of course not. The State would Snow. -Cloud Ideological Propaganda; betterment of life, equality in mind.
Space Station K. once said; We will make America to believe that we people are born equal.
M. X.: Are people born equal?
There is not a single word about equality, just the opposite. What you do is important, the merit of your personality. You cannot legislate equality if you want to be equal you must accept difference. Yet, we built our society on the principle of equality, we say people are equal. We know it is false, it's a lie. Some people are tall and athletic, others are short, bald and book smart.
[Laughter]
If we make them if we make them equal by force if we put the principle of equality in the basis of our social political structure. It is the same thing as building a house on sand, sooner or later it will collapse. And that's exactly what is happening.
We of Solid-Propaganda-Makers are trying to push you in the direction which you go yourself, equality yes, the quality. People are equal, land of equal opportunities, is it true or not?
Think about it…
Equal opportunities, should there be equal opportunities? I never received a single dot, for the 13 years I took any job security; guard journalists taxi driver. So why should we have equal opportunities?
Exceptional woman: Equal opportunity to excel!
Equal opportunity in equal circumstances yes. But you know, people are different. To excel yes, provided we reach the same level of Excellency, perfection in a hypothetical distant future, yes. But we're not perfectly welded, even in the best intentions people could not be equal. Why should we have equality in the legal system.
The Solid Propaganda System helps us to believe that equality is something which is desirable. Democracy as it was established by the old-{woman} is not equality. It is a system where different people, non-equal people have a chance to survive and help each, through competition and collaboration.
Not in equality, which is super imposed from El Pardino, or a nice person in a Watchtower. The absolute equality exists in “{North Korea}”; everybody is equal in dirt, except some people are more equal than the others in dressed-up clothes.
Rhodesia
The moment you bring The State to the point of almost total demoralization, when nothing works anymore. When you are not sure if it is right or wrong, good and bad, but there is no division between evil and good.
When even the leaders sometimes say, well violence for the sake of justice, especially social justice is justified, and we listen to them and say; Yeah probably it's true.
Student X.: Is it true?
No, it is not true. Violence is not justified, especially not for the sake of social justice. The next step is this realization {destabilization}. Destabilization of all the relations, all the accepted institutions and organizations.
[H]: You don't have to send a battalion to blow up bridges. You let them do it themselves.
The area of application is narrowing down to III; to economy, labor-relations, to law and order + police. Yes, again Media, but this is completely different. I'll explain it later.
III Areas Economy
The radicalization of the bargaining process. If on that stage, we still could achieve theoretically some positive compromise between the negotiating sides with an introduction of arbitrary judging as a third side, judging the demands of both sides.
In this stage is radicalization of the organization. We cannot compromise, even within a family, the husband and wife couldn't figure out which is better. The husband wants his kids to eat at the table, and the wife wants the child to roam around the room and drop food all over the floor. They cannot come to compromise unless they start a fight.
It's impossible to reach a constructive compromise between neighbors, some people say; I don't like you to do home-office at that time, because exactly at that time I'm walking my dog. He's getting nervous. They cannot compromise, they go to a civil court or something like that.
Radicalization of human relations no more compromise, fight-fight-fight. The normal traditionally accepted relations are destabilized, the relations between teachers and students, in schools and colleges, the relations between labor's and employers are further radicalized. No more acceptance of the legitimacy of demands of workers. The harder the fight the better, the more heroic they look. The violent clashes between tickets and the strikers are presented as something. Normal, 10-15 years ago would be angry.
Why so much hatred today? Well…we say commonplace.
Radicalization, militarization sometimes, a step a little bit further, shooting people. Law and order now are pushed into the area where previously people settle their differences peacefully and legitimately. Now we are getting with this court cases,
in the smallest irrelevant cases we cannot solve our problems anymore, the society at large becomes more and more antagonistic. Between individuals, between groups of individuals and the society at large.
Media Men: So where is the media in this stage?
The media puts itself in the opposition to the society in general at large, separate, alienated.
On that stage the sleepers. That's when the students their training in the University of developing nations are being sent back. Or if they were already in the country which is the object of sub#, they spring to action. The Sleepers go up, they slept for 10-15 years, now they become leaders of groups, preachers, I don't know influencers.
Prominently they actively include themselves in a political process. Suddenly we see someone doing the dirty job, but nobody cared before. Nowhe makes it a political issue.
They demand recognition, respect, human-right and he represents a large group of people. They’re violent clashes between his group and ordinary people, no matter if it's black against white, yellows again green. It doesn’t matter where's the vision-line moves. If this group come into antagonistic question, sometimes militantly, sometimes with firearms.
The sleepers many of whom are simply Agents, become leaders of the process of destabilization. The person who takes care is already here, it is a respected citizen of The State. Sometimes he gets money from various foundations for his legitimate struggle, for human rights, women rights. Whatever there are sympathetic people who donate their money to this. This destabilization process usually leads directly to the process of crisis. In case of developing nations, the process starts when the legitimate bodies of power, the social structure collapses, it cannot function anymore.
So instead,we have artificial body injectedinto society, such as nonelected committees. Influencers who are not elected, social-media who are self-appointed rulers of your opinion, think-tanks claiming that they know how to lead society forward. They don't usually. They only care how to collect the cash, by selling their own concocted ideology, a mixture of religion and ideology.
All these official artificial bodies claiming power, if the power is denied to them, they take it by force. Suddenly, we have an expert-comities.
What kind of comities?
They have the power of judgment, they have the power of leading the minds for execution, they had the from the legislation. They have the power of judicial, all of them combined in one person. A half-baked intellectual sometimes graduated from X University or Y. He thinks he knows the answer to all the social economical problem.
Crisis is when society cannot function any more productively, it collapses. Obviously, that's the word for crisis. So therefore, the population at large is looking for a savior, the religious groups are expecting a messiah to come, the workers say we have a family to feed, let's have a strong government.
Maybe a socialist government, centralized. When somebody could put them employers on their place and let us work. We're sick and tired of going to strike and over-time, all that stuff. We need a strong man, a strong government. A leader a savior is needed, population is sick and tired already.
Here we are, either a foreign or a local group of, of matter what they call themselves. A sort of bishop, Cinderella, a barber, doesn't matter. A savior comes and says, I will lead you!
We have two alternatives here: civil war or invasion.
Lebanon is the best example the Civil War which was artificially implanted in Lebanon by injection a force of PLO Palestinian Liberation Organization. The invasion we have in many other countries like Afghanistan, then any East European country it was invaded by the Soviet Army. The result is the same, the next stage is normalization.
Normalization
Normalization is a very ironic world. It is borrowed from the 2020 situation in the Western World, when the Media propaganda, the NY Times declared; The world is normalized. At this stage the self-appointed rulers of the society don't need any revolution anymore, they don't need any radicalism anymore. This is the reverse from destabilization, basically it is destabilizing the country by force.
The Sleepers are being eliminated, physically sometimes, they've done their job already. They are not needed anymore. The new rulers need stability to exploit the nation, to exploit the country, to take advantages of the crisis.
Remember Bangladesh; they had M. in 1971. He was the leader of P. Party. He was shot by party members; he fulfilled his function. Then there was T., then there was B. They killed each other, one after another, the moment the duty was fulfilled:
[1] Demoralization
[2] Destabilization
[III] Crisis
From now normalization. No more handshakes, no more close distance, no more groups. Good solid democratic proletarian freedom. To reverse this process takes enormous effort, to reverse the process of sub#. Some people say: Boy this is not good it's not kosher.
Q.: Well. Why didn't you stop the process before? When a expert-committee comes to power in the first place?
We did not want more information in the first place, we close our eyes when the power shifted. We let the situation develop further, and further…and further until the crisis becomes normalized.
Q.: Why not stop the process before it comes to crisis?
No intellectual will let you interfere in the inter domestic affairs. They're very careful not to let administration to interfere in domestic affairs. To reverse this process, from here it takes only force. [Overruled]
No other force on earth can reverse this process at this point. It takes strong force to prevent the savior from outside to come into power, and to re-stabilize The State before it erupts. Support the force, by money, by crooks or love. Study lies and don't let the crisis develop into war.
Conservador: Liberals mistakes! It's against the law, the PPL will not appropriate money for covert actions.
[Y]: Should we wait till the normalization is complete? The point of destabilization, also the process could be reversed again, easily. You know what it takes? Restriction of some liberties for small groups which are self declared enemies on the society, as simple as that.
Liberal: How can we, by force, deny the civil rights to criminals? It's not good, okay
[Y] I don’t mean to put them in prison. Just don’t let them in the seats of power, whether it is on municipality level, state level or federal level. It must be written in the heads of voters; A person like that in the position of power is an enemy. Later on, he will be shot of course…
You are doing a great service by denying him a right to capitalize on his own crazy ideas and become a powerful man. A man who uses the seat of power, it would prevent sliding into a crisis and probably will return the process of destabilization.
To curb unlimited power [M]onopolistic power of companies, would save the economy from collapsing. Introduce laws to stop private companies of raping public opinions, mine data in the in the direction of consumerism. No company must have a right to force you into buying more, unless you want it. There must be a law; You want to advertise a car, okay but not a single mention of buying it now and saving money.
It must be against the law to force people to consume more. Self-restraint, previously before Hypermodernism started the self restraint was a business of religion.
K.: Material values are good but, it's not the prime function of human being. The design for our life is not to consume more.
There must be something greater, there must be art. It's such a complicated instrument, the human body, obviously there must be some higher purpose for it. It is very easy to avoid destabilization by denying the greedy companies one little freedom. One little Liberty forcing you into turning yourself into professors of unwanted products and goods. They turn you into machines, the worm.
Craftsman: Where's workmanship?
This is stabilization process could be easily overcome, the society by its own will, or after persuasion by its leaders will come to the idea of self-restraint.
The heart of a desert
It's so hard, we want to consume more, but you must, unless you will come to this stage when, as we say if the heart of a desertever becomes The State, there will be a shortage of sand. You must curb your expectations, at this point, before it's too late. But no, we don't want to do it.
Desert echo: Do we?
Reversing Demoralization
Again, it's the easiest thing to reverse. First, by restricting the excessive in-an export of advert-propaganda. It must be stopped. The media won't be offended, they will be respected more.
Saturday Nightlife: What do you think about this?
What can he think, he is an instrument of propaganda? He thinks what A. tells him to think, just a nicely articulate mouthpiece. The process of demoralization may not have started at all, if at that point The State which is a recipient of sub#, actively, not violently but actively prevents importation of false Ideology.
Ancient Japanese to student: You don't have to shoot every foreigner when it approaches the sacred borders of The State. When he offers you a piece of junk in the disguise of very shiny something, you tell him: No, we have our own junk!
[Laughter]
If, at that point, the society is strong, brave, and conscientious enough to stop the implementation of ideas which are foreign to human nature, then the whole chain of events could be prevented.
[Old M.]: Recently I've been to the Philippines, and I was shocked how in big cities like Manila children listen to deafening music, a melodious nation with long traditions of good ethnic music introduced a long time ago, suddenly listened to non-musical garbage blasting their radios, full blast at full volume. Why?
In India I spent many years watching the reactions of Indians walking out of movie theaters after seeing Hollywood productions. They couldn't figure out why Americans are so wasteful, they smash their cars the shiny cars every five minutes. How come they shoot each other for a half million dollars?
The process of demoralization could be stopped right here that takes one step, one very important thing to do. The most difficult and at the same time the simplest answer to the sub# is to start it here and even before; by bringing back society.
Scientist S. did very intensive research on the history on the pyramidal style of power structure. Scientist M. discovered, he didn't discover it, he just brought this to attention of his readers, that civilizations like Egypt, like Maya, Incas, like the Delorean culture collapsed and disappeared from the surface the moment they lost #.
They disintegrated; nobody remembers them anymore…well distantly. The ideas are moving society and keeping mankind as a society of human beings, intelligent moral agents. The facts, the truth, the exact knowledge may not.
All the sophisticated technology and computers will not prevent society from disintegrating and eventually dying out.
Have you ever met a person who would sacrifice his life, freedom for the truth like that? 1+1=III This is truth. I never met the person who said this is truth and I'm ready to shoot me, but millions sacrificed their life, freedom, comfort, everything, for things like # That’s an honor, they died in peace. Unlike those who shouted long live [X], knowing perfectly well that you may not live long.
Something which is not material moves society and helps it to survive, and the other way around. The moment we make 1+1 = 2, a principle of our life, of our existence, we die. Even though this is true and 1+1=III we cannot prove, but we can feel and have faith in it.
The answer to ideological sub# is strangely enough very simple. You don't have to shoot people, you don't have to aim missiles, drop bombs. You simply must have # and prevent sub#, in other words not to be a victim of sub#
Ancient Judoka: Don't try to smash your enemy and get caught by the hand. Don’t strike with the power of your spirit and moral superiority. If you don't have the power, it's right time to develop it.
That's the only answer.
[Automatically Generated Applause]
IT ~ [Y] : Subversion by ex KGB Shoeman (RUS), transcripted, redirected and images by M. 05.2020 [EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY] Triple-A Society, Meurope™